Sunday, February 24, 2019

CSIC8100 Post 5

Create a reflective entry to discuss how you are addressing the context of different audiences (local, national and/or international) and their perspectives while you are taking action.
The audience I would like to write about in relation to my inquiry is the business world. This could be local businesses or international businesses. People who work outside the education world might ask why we conference with children. Conferences also promote engaged learning because teachers can identify a child's interests and use these to develop an interesting learning path or inquiry.
In Trends Shaping Education Spotlight 15, the writers state that "Scientific literature on technological development suggests that advances in computers’ artificial intelligence, vision and movement capabilities could impact tasks carried out by the majority of workers in currently existing jobs (Elliott, 2017)." This means that the 21st Century students need to develop a different skill set to students of the past. 
The article discusses various issues related to the use of Information and Communication Technology in schools. However, the last section "Towards the Future" is most relevant to my inquiry about conferences with students. 
The Towards the Future section discusses the importance of 'supporting more personalised and engaged learning". The conference process is one way that teachers can achieve this. When conferences are conducted individually  teachers have the perfect opportunity to personalise learning to the child.
Bolstad,Gilbert,McDowall, Bull, Boyd, & Hipkins, (2012) ask "Why does personalising learning matter for the 21st Century?". They answer this question by saying that personalised learning involves a 'systems level shift'; one in which "the system is built around the learner"(pp17). Individual learning conferences are evidence of this shift in practice in a modern learning environment. This systems level shift is difficult for some people outside the 'education industry' to understand (and some within). 
At our school, teachers conference with children in order to find out how to build a learning system around them. This system can be very personalised and can differ from child to child. As times goes on, our teachers are learning more about how they can work as a collaborative team to cater for many different kinds of learners at one time. 
Bolstad,Gilbert,McDowall, Bull, Boyd, & Hipkins, (2012) also say that in 'deep expressions of personalised practice' students will have genuine input into shaping their learning, and the learning activities that they are involved in at school. Learning conferences are one way to create a genuine opportunity for students to contribute to the design of their own learning. 
Another aspect of personalised learning discussed by Bolstad et al (2012) is the need to "...shape a learners pathway in ways that support their needs and interests...".  A skilled teacher will be able to tell where a child is at, and what their next steps could be. 
The teachers in our team seem to enjoy the opportunity to conference with children individually. However, they are grappling with the ups and downs of a school day, time management, multi-tasking, unpredictable events and real live emotional young human beings. It is important to remember that deep learning is not a one way race to the finish line, although sometimes it happens quickly. Deep learning is more like an orienteering event in which the destiny keeps changing - so it's important to keep checking in with the competitors along the way to make sure they still know where they are going!
References:- Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching — a New Zealand perspective. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/109306
OECD. (2018).Trends shaping education 2018 spotlight. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/Spotlight-15-A-Brave-New-World-Technology-and-Education.pdf


Thursday, February 21, 2019

CSIC8100 Applied Practice in Context Number 4

“Discuss how issues of ethics, society, culture and professional environments (including law, regulations and policy) are being addressed while you are taking action”.

I have chosen to use the Ethical Decision Making Model to discuss ethical issues relating to my research. 

Critical Incident and Responses to Critical Incidents

Most children are open to havinzdfghg a learning conversation with me in the course of a day, but there are a couple who refuse. This is a problem because conferencing with children is one of the main ways that we record learning and offer guidance to ākonga. How might I respond? Is it appropriate to make children have learning conferences with a teacher?

There are some different points of view to consider. 

Ehrich, Kimber, Millwater, & Cranston (2011) say that research processes need to "Avoid causing harm, distress, disadvantage or anxiety." The children we work with in school have the right to an emotionally safe learning environment where they are treated with respect. 

Ehrich, L. C. , Kimber M., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N. (2011) also point out that researchers need to avoid lowering self-esteem by highlighting difficulties and deficiences. It is possible that compelling children to participate in learning conferences could do this.

The NZARE (2010) encourages researchers to consider using research methods which '...promote the aspirations of Maori". I believe that the learning conference offers teachers an opportunity to engage with Maori students about topics which are of interest to them as Maori. 

NZARE (2010) principle 3.3. discusses Capacity to Consent; asking the researcher to consider the participants capacity to give consent. This is an interesting issue when the participant is a child. Do whānau give schools the right to include children in research projects when they enrol their children in New Zealand schools? The NZ Curriculum (2007) certainly encourages teachers to participate in research and teacher inquiry (pp34).

Beliefs that impact on my decision making could be:

I believe that learning conferences are the best way to offer personalised feedback to children. Russell Bishop (2010) confirms this when he describes the value of descriptive feedback to Maori students.  

I believe some children are too shy to talk with the teacher by themselves. 

I believe that it is my job as a teacher to get to know children individually as learners. 

The choice I have made is offer more choice to children. I thought that I could set up a booking system and children could choose to come to a group conference or an individual conference. Both conferences will follow the same format. 

Implications could be that some children do not end up participating in individual conferences, which is one of the school assessment guidelines.

Some children might participate in a group conference and then find that they are comfortable with the conference process which will enable them to participate in individual conferences in the future. 

Group conferences might produce more interesting discussions with children about learning.



Ehrich, L. C. , Kimber M., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N. (2011). Ethical dilemmas: a model to understand teacher practice, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 17:2, 173-185, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2011.539794  
Ministry of Education (2007), New Zealand Curriculum 2007, Learning Media, Wellington, NZ

New Zealand Association for Research in Education (NZARE). (2010). NZARE Ethical Guidelines. Retrieved  from:- http://www.nzare.org.nz/portals/306/images/Files/NZARE%20EthicalGuidelines2010.pdf





CSIC 8100 Applied Practice in Context Number 3

Examine how indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness are informing the way you are taking action.

I really enjoyed the readings and viewings about cultural responsiveness for this post because they resonated with my personal pedagogy and that of my school. I feel that learning conferences with individual ākonga are a great opportunity to practice personalised culturally responsive pedagogy. 

Bishop (2012) describes an 'agentic teacher' who believes in each child's ability to achieve. He says that agentic teachers are able to manage the classroom in such a way that they can have "...interactions with young Maori people which provide them with academic feedback and feedforward." 

Learning conferences achieve this goal. The ākonga and kaiako can use the learning conference as an opportunity to connect prior knowledge, set goals, offer support, advice and feedback. The whole learning journey can be designed in a personalised and culturally responsive way for the individual ākonga.

A speaker in the Teaching Tolerance (2010) video reiterates the need to cater for individual voice, stating that a 'one size fits all' approach to cultural diversity can be damaging. She points out that "Each child brings their own version of culture, which is highly personalised."

Bucher (2008) describes the nine mega skills for Cultural Intelligence. Number 9 is about "Understanding the Dynamics of Power; meaning that it is important that kaiako understand that they usually hold the power in a classroom. I see learning conferences as an opportunity to hand this power back to the ākonga because their intention is put the ākonga in charge of their learning journey.

I have chosen to use the Mauri Model to reflect on how I have gone about taking action in regards to learning conferences; and also to discuss how our team are responding to the requirement to do learning conferences.

I see myself as being in the Mauri Ora state of being actively engaged. I feel highly motivated and committed to helping to establish learning conferences routine mahi for kaiako in the teina hapori. My recent Mindlab work has enabled me to change the direction of my research so that I am now reading, writing and thinking about an aspect of my work that is related to my research but that is more engaging for me. 

I feel alert and I am interested in talking with other kaiako about their experiences so I understand them more. I would like to create opportunities for kaiako to discuss the why, how and when of learning conferences. 

I believe that hapori wide a few of our kaiako may be in the Mauri Moe state. They may be choosing not to participate because they are feeling anxious about how our emphasis on learning conferences challenges their  perception of their role as a kaiako. Other kaiako are in a Mauri Oho state where they are interested in finding out how they can make the time to have effective, culturally responsive and culturally intelligent learning conversations with our ākonga.



Bucher, R. (2008). Building cultural intelligence (CQ): Nine Megaskills. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Edtalks.(2012, September 23). A culturally responsive pedagogy of relations. [video file].Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/49992994

Pohatu, T. W. (2011). Mauri - Rethinking human wellbeing. MAI Review, 3, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.review.mai.ac.nz/index.php/MR/article/v...

Teaching Tolerance( 2010, Jun 17) Introduction to Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Retrieved from:
https://app.themindlab.com/media/31865/view 

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

CISC 8100 Applied Practice in Context Week 2



The reflective model I have chosen to use is the Jay and Johnson model. I have decided
to use this model to analyse what is happening hāpori wide in regards to conferencing
with ākonga. It was not my original intent to collect comparative information in regards
to how other kaiako manage conferencing. However, because I am experiencing
some difficulties myself and also because this is a new process for some,
I thought this could be a useful topic to reflect on.


What is happening?
The kaiarahi (team leaders) recently informed us of the required frequency of
conferences with ākonga, this being once every two weeks. Interestingly, this is
a match with the frequency of conferencing I aimed to achieve during my research.
I am not yet managing to achieve this frequency. Remarks from other kaiako
indicate that they are experiencing the same difficulty, so I am curious to see
how and if we can improve.


Is this helpful and for whom?
It seems helpful to me to have a specific goal set for kaiako by the kaiarahi.
There is a clear expectation of what we are expected to achieve. It may put pressure
on some kaiako and this could create negative outcomes for them. This action is helpful
to ākonga who will come to expect regular individual and personalised conferencing
time with kaiako.


How am I feeling?
I am feeling inspired to achieve this goal. It makes me feel like changing the
focus of my research from encouraging whānau interaction with LincEd to
encouraging kaiako interaction with ākonga.


What do I not understand?
I don't understand how our current timetable might or might not limit the
ability of other kaiako to achieve the goal of conferencing once each fortnight
with ākonga.


How do other people who are involved or indirectly involved describe
what is happening?
Feedback from other kaiako indicates varying levels of success. One kaiako is
very happy, while others are experiencing frustrations with time and experience.


What does research contribute to an understanding of this matter?
Baleghizadeh and Zargami (2015) say that "At all times, students must
feel that the conference is under their control and for their benefit." This statement
makes me wonder how kaiako can best approach the topic of a conference
with ākonga, and how ākonga feel about conferences.


The research Baleghizadeh and Zargami (2015) conducted in regards to
student conferencing concluded that students who conferencewith teachers
achieve similar results to students who are tested by teachers. However they
state "...it can be concluded that applying alternative assessment procedures
resulted in a significant difference between the participants' attitudes...". This
conclusion fits well with our schools pedagogical statements in regards to
assessment.


How can I improve what is not working?
I could help kaiako to explore different ways to manage conferences.


Critical Reflection


What are the implications of the matter when viewed from these alternative
perspectives?
I now feel that conferencing is a more specific task than I originally thought.
It could be useful to develop a conference format to use repeatedly so that ākonga
will know what to expect from a learning conference.  


How does this reflective process inform and renew my perspective?
McManes (2015) states that "The key to a successful student-led conference
is the preparation." A professional development session about conferencing would
be useful for helping our kaiako to prepare well. It could cover research and
pedagogy about formative assessment; suggestions for formats; possible questions
and role playing.


References:
Baleghizadeh, S., & Zarghami, Z. (2015). 3 ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING:
THE IMPACT OF STUDENT-GENERATED TESTS AND CONFERENCING
ON EFL STUDENTS' GRAMMAR LEARNING.
The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4(1), 45+.
Retrieved from
u=per_unit&sid=AONE&xid=5c2be80f
McManes, G. (2015). Student-Led Conferencing in PE Showcasing their skills and
achievements can help students take ownership of their learning.
Physical & Health Education Journal, 81(1), 22–23. Retrieved from
http://libproxy.unitec.ac.nz:2048/login?url=
=108643468&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Monday, February 18, 2019

CISC 8100 APPLIED PRACTICE IN CONTEXT Week 1


Reflect on what you have done so far to take action

Step 2 of my inquiry states that I will "Conduct a learning conference with six ākonga.
Record the conference notes on Linc Ed and publish the post for whānau to view."

I have unexpectedly taken on a new role at my school for 2019. This has impacted on
the amount of time I spend with learners, and therefore on my ability to carry out my
research plan in the way I intended. However, advice from the Ministry of Education
reminds us that "...talking about taking action is not the same as taking action." (Ministry
of Education, 2019). So I have decided to carry on and make adaptations as I go;
depending on how my new workload affects my ability to follow the research plan.

In my original plan, the ākonga I would conference with three times during the course
of the research, were intended to be ākonga from my puna ako group. Interestingly,
I have managed to conduct brief conferences with more than six ākonga hapori wide.
However, they were not all students from my puna ako group as I originally intended.
I have met with some ākonga in a different capacity because of my new role.

I think this is ok for the purposes of the research because I am not intending to draw
any conclusions about how the age of the ākonga, or the reason for my interaction
with them; might affect the level of parent interaction with the LMS. However, the
whānau of ākonga outside my puna ako group might be surprised to hear from a
different kaiako than usual, so I will have to take time to explain the reason for my
call with them.

I have also come to realise that my original  time frames may not run to plan, or
possibly, that if I stick to the time frame for the research, I may not meet the
goal of conferencing with the required number of ākonga each week and overall.

The Ministry of Education (2019) suggests that leaders " Sustain momentum by
setting timeframes for action – two or four weeks – and reporting back on progress".
I feel that taking time to reflect on my progress so far has helped to improve my
motivation; and I am hopeful that I will be able to continue with my inquiry.

After reading the information on the Ministry of Education website, I have also begun
to wonder how I might be able to involve students in reflecting on the value of learning
conferences. The website states that it is desirable to be "Involving learners in
deciding whether the action taken is effective in helping them to learn." (Ministry of
Education, 2019).

It would be interesting to ask ākonga how much they value feedback from whānau.

Kaser and Halbert (2017) discuss the value of formative feedback for students. They
say that kaiako can use opportunities for formative feedback to "... to provide descriptive
coaching feedback and learner self-regulation." I see conferencing with ākonga as an
opportunity to offer descriptive feedback to our ākonga as a vital part of their learning in
a self-regulated learning environment.


Kaser, L. and J. Halbert.(2017). The Spiral Playbook: Leading with an inquiring
mindset
in school systems and schools. C21 Canada. Retrieved from:-
content/uploads/2016/10/Spiral-Playbook.pdf

Ministry of Education, Educational Leaders 2019. Retrieved from:-
earning/Taking-action#eztoc660316_0_1