How do 20 and 21st Century learning skills differ? Do we
need both?
Reference:- What 60 schools can tell us about teaching 21st
century skills
Ted X
Grant Lichtman
I think that 20th Century learning skills were more defined
and finite than 21st Century learning skills.
Our pre-2000 curriculum documents described the content and
skills required at each age and stage, for every curriculum subject. Whilst the
2007 Curriculum did this too, it also introduced introduced the 'key
competencies' which to me, were the most important part of the document. The
key competencies are:-
thinking
understanding language symbols and text'
managing self
relating to others
participating and contributing
Students who develop these skills can become self-determined
learners who continue to adapt and change after they have left school and moved
on to other endeavours - be that further education or work place learning.
Their learning is not finite, limited to what happens at school, during school
hours and with a teacher. These are the skills required by a 21st Century
learner.
I've thought this over for a couple of days now, and I think that the students who develop the key competencies will be well placed to learn anything at all; and that therefore, the rest of the curriculum is possibly no longer relevant.
Teaching
Teach in ways that enable learners to learn from one another, to collaborate, to self-regulate and to develop agency over their learning.
-->
No comments:
Post a Comment